About the project
A virtual seat on the world political stage.
World Virtual Vote lets people anywhere explore real election campaigns, compare candidates, cast non-official virtual votes, and see how participating users across the G20 view the same race.
Why World Virtual Vote exists
Major elections shape relationships far beyond national borders, yet most people only encounter another country’s campaign through fragmented headlines. World Virtual Vote creates a structured place to understand the field, compare platforms, and express a view—regardless of where a participant lives.
The experience begins with a G20 country holding a current leadership or major national election. Candidate profiles use consistent sections and traceable sources. Virtual voting runs in two-week rounds, allowing the same participants to reconsider as debates, news, alliances, and platforms develop. Results can be compared by the G20 country participants identify as their viewpoint.
What this project is—and is not
This is a private, independent publication and virtual participation platform. It is not affiliated with the United Nations, the G20, any national or local government, an election commission, a political party, or an official referendum authority. Participation here does not register anyone to vote, cast a legal ballot, determine public office, or create a binding policy decision.
Any public-opinion activities published by World Virtual Vote should be read as the views of participating respondents under the stated conditions. Open online participation can reveal engagement and generate ideas, but it should not be presented as a scientifically representative estimate unless the recruitment and sampling design genuinely support that claim.
“The point is not to make every voice sound the same. It is to make the conditions of listening clear.”
Our editorial principles
Plain language
Methods and limitations should be readable by the people whose responses create the result. We prefer a complete, understandable sentence over technical language used as decoration.
Visible context
Question wording, response dates, valid counts, recruitment methods, exclusions, and material limitations belong beside the result—not hidden several clicks away.
Human dignity
Public disagreement should not erase the person on the other side of a percentage. We reject harassment, dehumanization, and identity-based contempt.
Corrections
Accuracy includes the willingness to correct. If you find a factual, methodological, accessibility, or translation issue, contact the editorial team. Material corrections will be dated and explained.
Who writes the guides
The World Virtual Vote editorial library is written and reviewed for general education. It draws on established ideas from survey methodology, data literacy, accessibility, privacy, and digital citizenship. Guides identify practical boundaries and encourage readers to consult official election authorities for legal voting information and qualified specialists for jurisdiction-specific advice.